Bigos in English is called Hunter’s Stew, and you ideally include wild game meat in it.

Besides that, shitton of spices, few other kinds of meat like pork and sausage, shrooms, prunes, cabbage (required) and onions.

And it must stew for at least half a day.

My dude. At over 4% market share companies are incentivised to buy out competition and become monopolies because it’s more profitable.

No one would be able to scale to serve global demand in any way, shape, or form

Yes. Perfect. Because any and all global companies so far are evil and anti-consumer. Disagree? Name 3.

The problem isn’t market share, it’s enforced market share. Anti-competitive practices. Lobbying. Buying out competition

So yeah, I’m glad we agree, that any company at 4% market share must be stopped from growing, because otherwise all of that happens.

Any business that has over 4% market rate should be forcibly split.

Steam is not FORCED to compete and innovate or go under, they do that at the whim of the owner. Who can change his mind. Or die, and the company will be inherited by whomever and sloppify.

Heck, anyone shilling that Steam is a good guy - ffs, you do not own the games you bought.

(Why 4%? There are some old studies that at 5% it brings more profit to get rid of the competition, below innovations are the way to get the money).

Both IIRC.

Bots aggressively scrapping everything they can.

How would that help? Bots will just move to another instance. Maybe yours.

Consider the fact he was in power for like 20 years, and he was purged during power struggles. And the problem, like always, is not communism, but the fact it was USSR - contemporary communists, like Mao, were calling it socialist in words, imperialist in deeds.

I don’t think his downfall screems “oh, he was arrested for his crimes” - it seems more “he’s getting purged for political reasons”?

Thats… Gummo?

When was the last time China got a trade deal or negotiated settlement because it pointed a load of guns and

~1950.

Imperialism is the stage of Capitalism where a militaristic foreign policy is developed and employed as a continuation of economic policy.

Same book - “socialist in words, imperialist in deeds”? But that doesn’t really matter, as you’re just gonna cherry pick other Lenin quotes at me like if its the Bible. Or call me names.

Nonetheless, I highly recommend the article I linked - but since it might paint a picture that you’re unable to comprehend (or unwilling to entertain), you will of course not read it.

Edit: and if you don’t like that source, here’s another fav of mine https://spectrejournal.com/one-should-not-camouflage-capitalist-and-imperialist-china-as-socialist/.

the US is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and that people still fail to see that after the epstein files is actually shocking

While this is true

https://progressive.international/blueprint/cb7dbaf4-b106-4105-8bde-fdab4bfc2fe8-building-whole-process-peoples-democracy-in-china/en/

To be fair, you didn’t pick ubiased authors here. Neither of the authors is capable of saying anything negative of China.

For example, Paweł Wargan proponent of new Chinese imperialisms with extra steps - e.g. https://www.thecommunists.net/worldwide/global/multi-polar-world-order-is-multi-imperialism/