• BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Now, of course, if you just give money away, that’s no good at improving people’s lives

    Actually, no, I’m pretty sure there have been many studies that show that literally just giving poor people money is all it takes. This is the first one I found after 15 seconds of searching; I think you are really underestimating how difficult it is for poor people to just get necessities, or how difficult it is to get out of debt traps.

    I see where you’re coming from. Drug addicts, gambling addicts, etc, may not be the best demographics to just give money to. But that is not most poor people. It’s a tiny fraction! Literally all we need is wealth distribution, with no need to overcomplicate things. It might not be perfect, but it would be magnitudes better than what we have now.

    Edit, to be clear, I’m not saying we shouldn’t fund hospitals and schools and whatnot. But it’s simply not true that giving money away isn’t effective.

    • DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Interesting! Thanks for the fact check. I always assumed giving money away would at best just be a temporary bandaid solution since you need a stable income to actually get out of poverty.

      Of course, this isn’t a problem with a stable UBI, I imagine.