Archive: [ https://archive.is/pPMwS ]

“This (law) is the most significant rollback of refugee rights in Canada in over a decade,” said Adam Sadinsky of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. “It’s disappointing that Canada has joined other countries in a race to the bottom in terms of protection of rights for migrants and vulnerable people.”

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It denies that right to thousands of people who already legally made a claim. Their human right to seek asylum is being denied.

    How would you like it if you had taken all the legal steps to apply for asylum and then a government comes and retroactively decided that, “no, your application never even happened, fuck you”?

    And then, let’s be clear. Even if 80% (a percentage I pulled out of my ass to look “high”, it could well be much less than that) of the 19,000 applications that are likely to be impacted were going to be rejected anyway, that means that 20% of them are legitimate cases. That would be 3800 people who are genuine refugees for whom Canada will just trample over their legitimate right to asylum. The MS St Louis that Canada famously forbade from unloading Jewish refugees fleeing from the fucking Holocaust had about 900 passengers, about 200 of whom ended up in gas chambers. Those 900 people are a stain in Canada’s history. And now we are just cancelling the applications, without any recourse, of many times over their number. We should have learned the lesson of MS St Louis.

    • lbfgs@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Holocaust story you shared is sad but has nothing to do with this specific change. I find it really disturbing that you cheapen the unique suffering of holocaust victims to score points here. Holocaust victims, or indeed anyone genuinely needing asylum, would not have waited over a year to apply.

      There has to be a cutoff for any change. I think there is a genuine argument to be made from a rule of law perspective that no law should have retroactive effect. However, considering your posts in this thread I have a feeling you wouldn’t be satisfied with making this law not retroactive anyway.

      • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Holocaust story you shared is sad but has nothing to do with this specific change.

        Holy fuck is this a bad faith argument.

        I’ll save you guys some trouble and say just stop engaging with the bait right here lol