That’s just the Dow for now, it will give us a lot more ow

I think he was joking :)

But if you want to know it’s because of an anatomical variant / birth defect where the testis is not fixed to the adjacent membrane called the tunica vaginalis.

Yes acne can still occur at the age of 31. It can also be a symptom of PCOS (as well as the irritability, but some women simply have more severe PMS than others). If she was on certain birth control meds it could have suppressed the acne before and when she stopped taking them caused her to break out.

Of note: a blood test that was done 7 years ago doesn’t say much about today. It is just a reflection of what her hormone levels were at the time.

Orchiectomy* or orchidectomy

Or in other words blueballectomy

I wasn’t gonna say this but since you’re making changes anyway: the recurrent laryngeal nerve doesn’t go around the heart but around the aortic arch and the great arteries.

Not the parts of the cow you usually find in ground beef

These idiots will never link this to (hyper)capitalism and megacorps and let alone think of alternatives remotely different from the current status quo.

Gas prices may affect the midterm votes though and they may vote against the extremist right wing candidates and for the liberal right wing candidates, which I guess is a small win.

“This port” guess we’ll never know….

Let’s hope for him that the psych ward is on one of the lower levels or has no windows

Nah he”ll have to wait until Tuesday

Gina tried to beat us… they couldn’t do it! It’s gonna be a beautiful bomb, a beautiful explosion. Is it explode or implode? It will be tremendous though!

It’s gonna be THE biggest bomb the world has ever seen, a tremendous explosion, you just… it’s the best… Europe doesn’t have this bomb, Iran doesn’t have it… it’s nuclear… people said it couldn’t be done but this administration did it… the cowardly democrats didn’t want it… it’s the best

The ackchual actual customers are the hedgefunds and other major investors.

I just love chicken tacos, don’t you?

Question unrelated to post.

From an uninformed person, you mean. I’m not from the US either.

The only difference?

Maybe you could understand that if you use hyperbole to make a point, even in informal conversation, it is a straw man argument.

Nothing on Lemmy is formal, so your repetitive point about it being informal is just more bullshit.

No, “genius”, you’re building straw man’s.

And you completely ignored what I said and tried to be obtuse just because you… how did you put it? “want to argue”.

I’m simply calling you on your bullshit. I don’t need you to agree to being called on your bullshit to be correct.

LOL, yes they do. They’re straw man arguments even:

Most drones miss their target but some make a successful hit —> “thousands of drones for a handful of hits”

1 FPV drone vs a 16 million dollar helicopter —> “$500 drone vs bazillion-dollar helicopter”

I’m not saying you disagree that their strategy is successful, but your attempt at “putting things into perspective” are over exaggerated and diminishes the actual successes.

Also: you don’t know me, so please don’t tell me what it is that I want :)

Mate, I’m gonna agree with the other guy here.

Your statements diminish the efforts and successes of the Ukrainian military, both by greatly exaggerating the amount of drones they use to land a successful strike and by mocking the reported 16 million number with your “bazillion”. The 16 million number is imo a completely believable amount.

They also simply did destroy a helicopter with a single drone. So the reporting is factual.

Everyone knows that many drones miss their target or get intercepted, just like bullets do. If a warthog destroys an armoured vehicle, we also report that the warthog destroyed the armoured vehicle and not that the majority of the bullets simply hit the ground next to the vehicle.