The 0.01 holds 1.77 trillion so the distribution is skewed. Furthermore there are likely many thousands of accounts in the ‘small’ amounts of tens of thousands, ostensibly for every member of an extended family in things like trust funds, etc.

Yep. Back around 2013 when the national credit rating slid down it became legal/not prohibited to do so after a lawsuit.

Eh, maybe. Thanks for providing the context for the assumption. I am not sure that makes them the same user, but it is shit if that’s support for whatever Beep is trying to do. It ain’t worth carrying water for anyone here, at any rate.

Block these accounts from the same user

How do we know it’s the same user? I know there’s vendetta against one, and the other just came out of the woodwork very recently with this whole silly crusade.

So I wouldn’t have made any sort of connection between the two accounts so I assume there’s some confirmation of that somewhere?

That was Trump’s go-to his first term. Why not the second? These ghouls are lasting longer than ever.

It’s a great example, actually. Trying to re-(re-re-re)hash 2024 is about the most counterproductive thing imaginable. If the dog’s dew claw doesn’t get purchase, what else is there to go on, right?

Yep. Hasan’s hate machine still runs with it anyway, since he draws kids away from the groypers and manosphere shit. They’re reliant on the lack of scrutiny.

Not liking is one thing. It’s another thing to take the next step and put energy into attacking Hasan. As in: the active practice of boxing out Hasan and any fans of Hasan.

He’s hugely popular with people under 30 as far as politics goes. He is turning on an entire generation towards politics while also acting as an alternative to Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate.

So you can imagine the kind of threat he poses.

Hasan continues to be an effective litmus test.

Like, if in 2026 you’re responding to the call to actively take time and energy out to hate on Hasan, you’re squarely an anti-leftist.

It includes all land between the Euphrates and the Nile. Portions of Egypt and Saudi also in the crosshairs.

There are actually a few twitch streamers that have political experience who stream about politics. They’ve run for office, or worked in D.C., so they have some interesting insights.

But that’s not Asmongold by a longshot.

I kinda like it. It’s just neat enough.

A lot of old city plats follow the exact pattern of that square, so I’d be curious what the sequence of development was.

Disco Elysium.

First go was after finally playing Planescape : Torment and I just wasn’t in the mood for another text heavy game, even though it came highly recommended and had some voiceacting from some podcasters I knew about.

Then the Final Cut came out with all the professional voice acting and it was absolutely excellent.

You know, I think Depeche Mode is a really sweet band!

It was a neat Warcraft 3 custom map.

Then it got weird.

Kind of. It isn’t wrong, but it is a crucial omission that it’s interviewing a former EPA enforcement guy (i.e. not current) about current enforcement policy, (which is radically changing under Zeldin.) So the model’s interpretation on whether the state will hold to federal pressure becomes imprecise since it’s really this guy stating there’s actually a lack of federal pressure.

But it does rightfully note information is not in the article to answer, which is neat.

Because… for context not directly in the article, technically if EPA defers to the state, then Mississippi saying temporary permit exemption actually applies here satisfies the permit requirement, which Buckheit has to know. (Which directly explains the lack of federal pressure.) Citing the policy in January was a clever non-answer from the EPA. They’re actually saying state and federal policies are NOT in conflict.

Also, I’m not trying to dismiss any of this, more trying to provide an insight that might help with accuracy. I have a bit of knowledge on this specific subject, so I thought I’d note a point where I can measure an inaccuracy.

These kinda of articles can be really sneaky about claims and statements. Mostly minor and innocuous, but an LLM doesn’t know the difference. Like, this caught that Buckheit is talking about what should be happening under previous admins when he was involved, but that’s specifically not what the EPA is doing anymore, which the LLM appears to have missed in part. Which to me, that part was the primary purpose of the article.

“List the article’s concrete claims about permit status and turbine operations, each with support.”

• EPA position: these turbines require permits under the Clean Air Act.

Not quite though. The article cited EPA’s policy as per a former EPA enforcement staffer who was explicitly stating the EPA is not requiring that here and has made rules deferring to the state and local authorities. The guy was saying the EPA should be acting, but isn’t. The article was clever with it, but that’s all the more reason.

Yeah, water is fuckin’ sick. Thermohydraulics is awesome.

That’s a painfully sad deletion. Aaron fought the good fight. It makes me sad how he came to an end.