There is this missconception (for me at least) that a joke must be accepted by all stakeholders.

I think it can be funny to some and offensive to others. Still a joke.

There are some lines I personally don’t cross but mostly i don’t take any prisoners.

Both at the same time.

How are they protected? I imagine a truck running in to it or a bit of chemicals would invalidate the votes. Only in blue districts of course.

Ten years ago when businesses really needed to offer wifi (train for example) they thought “hey we would like to have something in return!”. I got offered a new ca a couple of times in the captive portal.

Yeah, not best practice but not unheard of.

Long history of releases and Bugfixes, No AI contributions at first glance … Could it be?!

Disclaimer: I don’t mind AI as a tool, I mind slop.

Innocent until proven guilty also apply to though crime.

You might want to separate people that are a potential hazard but that sets a dangerous precedent.

Also: somebody that might be easily angered and might hit somebody in a bar when drunk should be locked away preemptively?

The thing You don’t seem to understand is that rapists committed rape and need to be punished. Pedophilia is a disorder that if it’s manifesting in a person may never have any impact on another person. Why? Because there are different ways it can affect somebody with the disorder. For some it might be a emotional thing, completely isolated from the world. For some it might just be a though of realizing that they are attracted to a person that is too young.

ACTING on these impulses is the problem. And that becomes way more likely when people don’t realize their pedophilic tendencies because they surpress any reflected thoughts since it’s a taboo to even consider that this disorder exists. And seeking help is even harder for the same reasons. So yes, Public shaming of EVERYONE that has this disorder is definitely not a smart move. Shaming and punishing people that act on it: yes please.