• 288 Posts
  • 86 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2023

help-circle











  • Call me an armored vehicle fan but I would take being able to produce Boxer armored vehicles and just flipping the automotive market into cheap electric vehicles over sustaining a massive ICE car production capacity.

    I guess my point is that part of the beauty of Electric Cars is that they commodify Automotive Production as a capacity because their drivetrains are an order of magnitude simpler, easier to produce and easier to maintain. Building cars with ICE engines is so much harder, it is like trying to build a space rocket with only analog and mechanical components. You can do it, we got really good at it, but once digital systems of control become possible the contrast was obvious. It is the same thing with Electric Cars compared to Gas Engine Cars.

    I can explain an electric motor to you, what you do is get some magnets and then stick a coil of wire inside the magnets on a spinny thing and then set the wires up so they pass a current that switches back and forth thus projecting a magnetic field that is always “repelling” from the magnets and thus the electrical energy is converted into mechanical spinning continously. There I did it, there is no way I can explain how a gas engine car actually transfers power to its wheels as simply.

    What is important with Electric Cars is a strong regulatory environment for testing highly digitized cars to make sure they aren’t bugged, prone to dangerous failure or pose a geopolitical threat in terms of surveillance to the country.

    shrugs

    …but I hate cars so take that as you will.

    Capacity to produce heavy industrial vehicles like this can also be laterally extended into heavy peacetime machinery too, obviously it requires different production lines but there is a lot of skills transfer and knowledge/physical capacity that isn’t easy to produce out of thin air that is shared between military and civil contexts here.

    Just ask the Archer about it.


  • Note while this is not a dedicated air defense platform the Spike missile and 30mm cannon (with airburst ammunition) can be used as decisive defense against a mass drone attack… which I am not saying is likely to happen to Australia but there is definitely a rational argument to be made here.

    While the weapons are big on this thing, ultimately its primary role is still to transport human beings through a dangerous space full of drones and other threats safely to do something which doesn’t have to be killing. In fact in Ukraine most of the time these types of vehicles are used to rescue wounded, facilitate planned tactical retreat of troops under heavy fire, and force open the capacity to rotate friendly troops at intense flashpoints of conflict when other less armored forms of rotating infantry would be suicidal.

    In peacetime though a single vehicle like this could be deployed to a port, or a sensitive area and ensure that somebody with a lot of drones and explosives couldn’t as easily and decisively threaten tragedy.

    I don’t know, far be it for me to say the military industrial complex isn’t a massive problem, I live in the US lol, but also I consider Australia a fairly stable open society and I think that from an international perspective at least I am happy Australia knows how to produce a modern armored fighting vehicle like this.

    The seduction of how cool military weapons look and the undeniable power they bestow is real though, I mean it is basically the moral of The Wind Rises right?

    Between this and Australia acquiring a large amount of Apaches, I think Australians can genuinely feel confident their country has taken the threat of counter drone operations and littoral security with regards to small unmanned vehicles seriously. Most nations in the world have not positioned themselves as wisely as Australia has, even some that are actively engaged in war as we speak…


























  • To be honest immediately not much, Trump is a russian asset so…

    Medium term though, Ukraine is a popular cause in the US, Trump and his cronies are always desperately trying to distract from that and throw a wrench in the mechanisms of the US trying to help Ukraine but they cannot as hard as they try make the majority of people in the US not find common cause with Ukraine, even when Trump hangs a picture of him and Putin in the whitehouse.

    The more Zelensky openly helps the US the more it destabilizes Trump/Republican attempts to sabotage Ukraine and makes Trump look like an unpopular weak fraud of a leader.

    It is classic “kill them with kindness”.