

I mean, there are software libraries that handle encryption for you.
You still need to know what you are doing to use them correctly and not introduce vulnerabilities.


I mean, there are software libraries that handle encryption for you.
You still need to know what you are doing to use them correctly and not introduce vulnerabilities.
Excess consumption of red meat is a cancer risk. And excess in this case is over about 100g per day. So even if it would be just beef from a country that doesn’t allow hormones and antibiotics to be used in meat production it would still be a risk.
Then that leaves only the cancer caused by both.


Doesn’t the penicillin grow at the same time as the milk solidifies?


Not anymore, but I’m old now. They don’t have to take care of me any more.
What countries do is not the same though. At least in the Netherlands when a company files for bankruptcy the judge will appoint someone to sell all the companies assets and try to pay back the debtors.


Are you sure you don’t mean short term vs long term punishment?
It doesn’t need to be a business to be able to go bankrupt. Governments have incomes, expenses and debtors. They only can’t file for bankruptcy to get out of their debts, which makes it worse for the country.
Being in danger from something does not mean it’s the more dangerous weapon. But this is going to turn in to a pointless discussion about what it means for a weapon to be dangerous. So you’re right for some definitions of dangerous.
With that kind of reasoning knives are more dangerous than nukes in the real world.


Technology will keep developing in ways we can’t predict yet. I think it’s unlikely we can save all our even most of humanity, but you never know what will happen. There is already research being done into options for geo engineering and the way things are going they will probably end up being tried. Even though that’s already technically possible to most people that would still be like magic.


Elections require trust. A properly designed voting system can be understood by the average voter. That’s impossible with electronic voting.


Yes it is easier to attack papier voting systems. But these attacks don’t scale. This video by Tom Scott is 6 years old now, but every argument still stands. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs


I made a statement about the past. No assumptions we made.


Are you trying to say I shouldn’t hit myself in the face with a hammer?
Thats right. It’s way more effective to sacrifice yourself to Bozmodiklax.
How do you run it on Android?


Remember that we have technology that 100 years ago would have been indistinguishable from magic.


Depends on where you live. Civilized places still use paper ballots, because electronic ones are practically impossible to get verifiably trustworthy.
Not everything happens on Lemmy