• qaz@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Could you please mark it NSFW and tag it as described in the rules?

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Marked it as NSFW, not sure what to tag it. I didn’t NSFW it initially because there wasn’t any nudity or near-nudity, and I didn’t think it needed it?

  • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    From the perspective of evolution having sex is a measurement of success, so I have mixed feelings about this message.

      • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I am not undermining potential social issues and neither have I said that you should let egocentric interests guide your life as we transcend biological goals by constantly fighting against our nature. However ignoring such goals are also a harmful, repressive idea. Saying “I’m not a prize” is different than saying “I’m not just a prize”.

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Interactions with people aren’t prizes, and shouldn’t be conceptualized as such.

          “Humans have needs and desires” and “Humans should conceptualize the fulfillment of their needs and desires as separate from the people they interact (and resulting consequences) with to achieve them” are two different things.

          Most basic idea, do unto others. People sometimes want to feel wanted, even in just a purely carnal sense; people generally do not want to feel treated like an object, an abstract, or a piece of meat in the process.

          • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I am not taking about what people want to be or what you should or should not do. My point wasn’t about “should” but about “is”. I am also not talking about all human interactions but specifically sex, which is goal oriented and has a very clear concept of a prize (a reward) if you think in terms of reinforcement learning.

            • Velma@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Wouldn’t the “prize” be the act of sex and not the woman herself? You are not granted ownership of a woman just by having sex with her.

              • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 hours ago

                True, I didn’t pay attention to that. A prize implies ownership. So she would represent a prize but not be one. Good point

            • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I am also not talking about all human interactions but specifically sex, which is goal oriented and has a very clear concept of a prize (a reward) if you think in terms of reinforcement learning.

              Okay, let me rephrase this again, in light of that wording of your position:

              “Do not treat human beings simply as means to achieve a goal, even if the human being is necessary for that goal.”

              • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I mostly agree if you look at it from a moral standpoint, even because completely guiding your actions by egocentric goals is antisocial behavior. My concern was about the complete erasure of that goal in language. It is true that humans are more than what their biology sets them to be, but obscuring the actual goal in language seems to be a repressive enactment.

                • Velma@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  It is true that humans are more than what their biology sets them to be, but obscuring the actual goal in language seems to be a repressive enactment.

                  It’s repressive to ask men to not view women only as sexual conquests because of biology?

  • Kaput@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    How can i tactfully say: i aggree you are a person and will treat you as such. However humam nature is such that your very pleasing apparence is currently shorting pathways from visual cortex to the brainstem. Or in short, i’m turning dumb right now, please hold while i get accustomed.

    Of course im mot going to have that conversation, its juste replying to this post.

    Sometime it feels like going from a dark room to full on sun, and the brain needs a little time adjusting.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think it was George rr martin in an interview was asked why he wrote women well

    “Well you know, I’ve always considered women as people.”

    https://youtu.be/fGmctvlITtI

    Even though this is the same man who wrote the “fat pink mast scene.” Lactation and all

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Finding people sexy is fine, but treat them as people first and foremost. Degrading and objectifying people isn’t humanizing, obviously, but neither is idolizing them or projecting an idealization of a romantic partner.

      • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Could you also explain what you mean by “objectification” and how is it different than “finding people sexy”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Generally, the not bothering of interacting with someone as a person beyond the sexual. It’s fine in certain contexts, namely one’s where that’s what everyone goes into the space looking for, but for contrast I typically know a few non sexual things about someone after a night of heavy flirtation and making out ar a bar