• 5 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 30th, 2023

help-circle
  • Important bit from Snopes:

    "In 2002, Omar and Hirsi reportedly applied for a marriage license. The couple married in an Islamic ceremony but never completed the process for a civil marriage, according to Hirsi. By 2008, Hirsi and Omar had separated (per Islamic custom). After that relationship ended, Omar had a civil marriage with Elmi in 2009. When that relationship ended, Elmi moved to England and they divorced per Islamic practice in 2011, but without receiving a legal divorce.

    Omar later reconciled with Hirsi and remarried in an Islamic ceremony. In 2017, Omar formally petitioned for divorce from Elmi, and legally wed Hirsi in 2018. Hirsi and Omar legally divorced in 2019.

    Snopes found no credible evidence that Elmi and Omar were siblings in a fraudulent marriage."













  • I’d LIKE to think so, but then Woody Allen did this:

    https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Whats-with-Baum/Woody-Allen/9798895652381

    "A middle aged Jewish journalist turned novelist and playwright, consumed with anxiety about everything under the sun, Baum’s turgid philosophical books receive tepid reviews and his prestigious New York publisher has dropped him. His third marriage is on the rocks and he suspects his handsome and successful younger brother may have seduced his Harvard-educated wife. He is uneasy with her close relationship with her son, a more successful author than he, and suspicious of her closeness with their neighbor in Connecticut. And in a moment of irrationality, he has impulsively tried to kiss a pretty young journalist during an interview that she is about to go public with.

    Is it any wonder Baum has started talking to himself? Strangers shake their heads and walk around him on the street. Meanwhile he learns a startling secret that could cause havoc should he expose it. Should he keep it to himself or reveal it and blow up his marriage?"



  • Reported to the mods as “opinion” which is true, but I lean heavily on the phrasing in the sidebar:

    “Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.”

    “MAY” be removed, not “will be removed”.

    If the opinion is based in fact, as this seems to be, I generally leave it be. It’s the misinformation/propaganda that can die in a fire. 😉